Is it possible to steal Wi-Fi signals? Brief analysis of the crime of theft and its possibility of encompassing Wireless Fidelity signals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70467/rqi.n12.6Keywords:
Crime of theft, patrimonial freedom, Wireless Fidelity, Wifi, principle of insignificanceAbstract
The author addresses the question of whether the act of “theft” of other people’s Wireless Fidelity or Wifi signals can be considered a crime as established in article 185 of the Peruvian Penal Code. Based on a conception of the legal good protected by this crime as patrimonial freedom, that is, the ability to dispose of one’s own property, he argues that the Wifi signal can be subject to protection according to the aforementioned criminal type. However, it maintains that its punishability should not be automatic in all cases, but should depend on the ability to quantify the harm caused to the taxpayer. In situations where said damage cannot be valued, it advocates the application of the principle of insignificance to exclude the punishability of the acts in question.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Quaestio iuris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.